Luckily experienced had came at help providing this two brief but complete surveys on error-correcting methods and exome variant analysis tools. Sure a useful compass to help navigate in the NGS sea! Take a look!
Brief Bioinform. 2013 Jan;14(1):56-66. doi: 10.1093/bib/bbs015. Epub 2012 Apr 6.
Yang X, Chockalingam SP, Aluru S.
Abstract
Error Correction is important for most next-generation sequencing applications
because highly accurate sequenced reads will likely lead to higher quality
results. Many techniques for error correction of sequencing data from next-gen
platforms have been developed in the recent years. However, compared with the
fast development of sequencing technologies, there is a lack of standardized
evaluation procedure for different error-correction methods, making it difficult
to assess their relative merits and demerits. In this article, we provide a
comprehensive review of many error-correction methods, and establish a common set
of benchmark data and evaluation criteria to provide a comparative assessment. We
present experimental results on quality, run-time, memory usage and scalability
of several error-correction methods. Apart from providing explicit
recommendations useful to practitioners, the review serves to identify the
current state of the art and promising directions for future research.
Availability: All error-correction programs used in this article are downloaded
from hosting websites. The evaluation tool kit is publicly available at:
http://aluru-sun.ece.iastate.edu/doku.php?id=ecr.
Brief Bioinform. 2013 Jan 21
Pabinger S, Dander A, Fischer M, Snajder R, Sperk M, Efremova M, Krabichler B, Speicher MR, Zschocke J, Trajanoski Z.
Recent advances in genome sequencing technologies provide unprecedented opportunities to characterize individual genomic landscapes and identify mutations relevant for diagnosis and therapy. Specifically, whole-exome sequencing using next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies is gaining popularity in the human genetics community due to the moderate costs, manageable data amounts and straightforward interpretation of analysis results. While whole-exome and, in the near future, whole-genome sequencing are becoming commodities, data analysis still poses significant challenges and led to the development of a plethora of tools supporting specific parts of the analysis workflow or providing a complete solution. Here, we surveyed 205 tools for whole-genome/whole-exome sequencing data analysis supporting five distinct analytical steps: quality assessment, alignment, variant identification, variant annotation and visualization. We report an overview of the functionality, features and specific requirements of the individual tools. We then selected 32 programs for variant identification, variant annotation and visualization, which were subjected to hands-on evaluation using four data sets: one set of exome data from two patients with a rare disease for testing identification of germline mutations, two cancer data sets for testing variant callers for somatic mutations, copy number variations and structural variations, and one semi-synthetic data set for testing identification of copy number variations. Our comprehensive survey and evaluation of NGS tools provides a valuable guideline for human geneticists working on Mendelian disorders, complex diseases and cancers.
No comments:
Post a Comment